000			01481cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS45937
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55978
041			_aeng
245			_aKings (Estate Agents) Ltd v Anderson and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 05 EG 166-170(3)
520			_aChD 24 October 1991. The plaintiff Kings (K), sought declarations as to the true construction of a rent review clause against the defendant landlords (A). The current market rental value was to be the amount agreed between A and K six months prior to commencement of the fourth rent period `or in the absence of agreement (time to be of the essence in this provision) as shall be determined by an arbitrator. The lease provided that the arbitrator was to make his determination by a date three months prior to commencement of the rent period. K claimed that A had failed to comply with the time schedule for the rent review and had no authority to apply for appointment of an arbitrator. Held that upon the true construction of the lease, there was no direction that the arbitrator had to make his determination by a date three months prior to the commencement of the fourth rent period. Declarations for A were refused.
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aTIME OF THE ESSENCE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34193 _d34193