000			01623cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS45938
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55980
041			_aeng
245			_aSkillion plc v Keltec Industrial Research Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 05 EG 162-166(4)
520			_aChD 19 June 1991. By a lease, dated 20 June 1985, between a London borough as landlord and the defendant, K, as tenant, premises in docklands were demised to K, for a term of 22 years at a rent subject to rent review provisions. General provisions included a limiting repairing covenant to keep the premises in a wind and watertight condition and a user covenant that held that certain areas were for the `research, development, testing, manufacture, repair and training in the use of engines, motors and components and mechanical devices together with ancillary office accommodation`. The issue which arose revolved around the requirement that the surveyor brought in the arbitrate should have regard to market rents subject to the provisions in the lease in particular to the user covenant. The plaintiff was successor in title to the lease, S, and wished to obtain a definition of `mechanical devices`. The question arose as to whether those were limited to apparatus for the provision of motive
650			_aGREENLAND DOCK
650			_aMECHANICAL DEVICES
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aRESTRICTED USE COVENANTS
650			_aUSER COVENANTS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34194 _d34194