000			01303cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS45939
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55984
041			_aeng
245			_aHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1991) 3 WLR 1144-1157(14)
520			_aHL 5 December 1991. Appeal from CA which allowed an appeal by the council (H) from cc decision dismissing H`s claim for possession of property let to the appellant (M) and his cohabitee on a joint periodic tenancy terminable by four weeks notice, which notice had been duly served by M`s cohabitee without his knowledge or consent. Held that a contractual periodic tenancy held by two or more tenants continued only so long as both agreed to its continuation and that unless specifically treated in the agreement, such a tenancy can be terminated by a notice to quit from one party only, without the consent or knowledge of the other tenants. Appeal accordingly dismissed.
650			_aJOINT TENANCIES
650			_aNOTICE OF TERMINATION
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34195 _d34195