000			01828cab a2200313 4500
001			ABS45941
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u55997
041			_aeng
245			_aWestminster CC v Clarke
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v142(6539) 14 February 1992, 196-200
520			_aHL 6 February 1992. The council (W) decided that the respondent C, was a vulnerable person who was homeless and had a priority need of accommodation under Housing Act 1885 s59(1)(c) and placed him in a hostel as a first step towards housing him. C was granted a `license to occupy` which provided that he had no right of exclusive occupation of any room which might be allocated to him and it did not create a landlord and tenant relationship. Under the license W could alter the accommodation without notice and could require the licensee to share that accommodation. Six months later W served C with a notice to quit for breaches of the conditions of occupation arising out of his conduct. When he refused W brought proceedings in the county court claiming possession. The judge held C was not a secure tenant under Housing Act 1985 part IV and granted a possession order. C applied to CA which allowed his appeal. W applied to HL which allowed the appeal on the grounds that C had never enjoyed
650			_aEXCLUSIVE OCCUPATION
650			_aEXCLUSIVE POSSESSION
650			_aHOMELESSNESS
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985 PART IV
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985 S59(1)(C)
650			_aLEASE V LICENCE
650			_aLICENCES TO OCCUPY
650			_aNOTICE TO QUIT
650			_aPRIORITY NEED
650			_aRENT ACTS
650			_aSECURE TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34203 _d34203