| 000 | 01020cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50675 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u56049 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aCodd, M. | ||
| 245 | _aLimiting distress | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v138(20) 27 May 1994, 524(1) |
||
| 520 | _aAn update on the law of distress, reporting two cases which have arisen since Abs49659: "Eller v Grovecrest Investments Ltd" (1994) and "Eren v Tranmac Ltd" (1993). The outcome in both cases set limits on landlords` power, the first decision reversing the establised view that a tenant cannot use set-off as defence against a landlord`s distress. | ||
| 650 | _aCONNAUGHT RESTAURANTS LTD V INDOOR LEISURE LTD 1993 | ||
| 650 | _aDISTRESS FOR RENT | ||
| 650 | _aELLER V GROVECREST INVESTMENTS LTD 1994 | ||
| 650 | _aEREN V TRANMAC LTD 1993 | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ARREARS | ||
| 690 |
_aLandlord and tenant _96252 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34220 _d34220 |
||