000			01633cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS45970
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u56115
041			_aeng
245			_aAttorney General ex rel Scotland v Barratt Manchester Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 148-170(23)
520			_aCA 19 June 1991. The premises was a farm of 100 acres of farmland. In 1985 an inspector, following a public inquiry, described the land as unique in the area, providing the only significant relief from urban development north of Bolton and enhancing the semi-rural character of the area. However in May 1989 the council issued a press release stating that it had reluctantly decided to end its battle over development of this area and allow it. Local residents stepped in and persuaded the Attorney General to lend his name to a relate action. In August 1989 this action was started against the developer, B. The local authority joined as an additional defendant. In January 1990 the action was dismissed but the residents continued to fight with a notice to appeal. In April 1990 a judge made an order for vacation of an entry in the land charges register in respect of this land in 1934, under Town and Country Planning Act 1932 s34, which said that the owner wished to preserve the land as open
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aRURAL AREAS
650			_aS34 AGREEMENTS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1932 S34
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34241 _d34241