000			01165cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS45972
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u56122
041			_aeng
245			_aEtheridge and another v SoS for the Environment and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 31-39(9)
520			_aQBD 8 March 1991. Appeal from inspector`s decision to uphold a refusal of planning permission for demolition of an existing building and erection of an office building with basement car park. Inspector concluded that under Development Control Policy Note 5 (DCPN 5) the development could be prejudicial to a future proposed retail centre and public multi-storey car park. QBD held, allowing the appeal, that the inspector had misinterpreted DCPN 5 which stated that permission may be refused for private development which conflicts with public proposals, but only if firm proposals exist which it is intended to carry out within a definite period.
650			_aPLANNING APPEALS
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34243 _d34243