000			01638cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS45974
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u56135
041			_aeng
245			_aSouth Lakeland DC v SoS for the Environment and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v142(6538) 7 February 1992, 159-160(2)
520			_aHL 30 January 1992. A diocesan parsonage board applied for outline consent to build a new vicarage on land within the curtilage of an existing vicarage in a village lying within a designated conservation area. Council (S) refused the application on the ground that the proposal would be severely detrimental to the area. An inspector`s decision to uphold this refusal was quashed by the High Court on the ground that the inspector had failed to discharge his duty under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s277(8) to pay special attention to the desirability of `preserving or enhancing` the character or appearance of the conservation area. On appeal by the SoS CA held that the inspector had discharged his duty under s277(8). S appealed to HL which held that `preserving or enhancing` the character or appearance of a conservation area under s277(8) was not restricted to positive contributions to preservation, but included developments that left character or appearance unharmed. Appeal accordi
650			_aCONSERVATION AREAS
650			_aPLANNING APPEALS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S277(8)
690			_aCONSERVATION-CASE LAW
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34248 _d34248