| 000 | 00992cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3244-20 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u56225 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLease | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1996 EGCS 172 (16/11/96) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "Crown Estate Commissioners v Possfund Custodian Trustee Ltd" ChD 5 November 1996" para 7 of the rent schedule had been correctly applied as certified statements as required by para 4(a) had not been produced. The overage provisions contained in para 2(b) had not been triggered as `net internal area` had been interpreted literally. | ||
| 650 | _aCERTIFIED STATEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aCROWN ESTATE COMMISSIONERS V POSSFUND CUSTODIAN TRUSTEE LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNET INTERNAL AREA | ||
| 650 | _aOPEN MARKET RENT | ||
| 650 | _aOVERAGE PROVISIONS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34290 _d34290 |
||