000			01499cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS46004
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u56296
041			_aeng
245			_aSurrey CC v Main and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 06 EG 159-160(2)
520			_aCounty Court 12 August 1991. A dispute over the amount of compensation payable to the tenant for milk quota, and the method for calculating `standard quota`. The tenant contended that the calculation of standard quota should be determined by multiplying the relevant number of hectares by the prescribed quota per hectare, producing a standard quota of 155,236 litres. The landlord argued that the standard quota was a higher figure of 208,484 litres, which reduced the excess by which the allocated quota exceeded the standard quota and thus reduced the amount qualifying for compensation. The argument centred on the determination of whether the standard quota should be calculated in accordance with para 6(1) of Schedule 1 to the Agriculture Act 1986, or para 6(2). At arbitration as to the amount of compensation payable, the tenant`s submission was accepted. As far as the judge could see, there was no evidence before the arbitrator which could lead to any other conclusion. (Grounds v Attor
650			_aAGRICULTURE ACT 1986 SCH 1 PARA 6
650			_aMILK QUOTAS
690			_aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34331 _d34331