| 000 | 00766cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2747-37 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u56454 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAssignment must be by deed | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v4 December 1991, 34(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Julian v Crago" CA 21 November 1991. In dismissing an appeal by the defendant (J), CA asserted that although the Law of Property Act 1925 ss 52 and 53 allowed the oral establishment of a lease, under specific conditions, its assignment was required to be in the form of deed. | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S53 | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34427 _d34427 |
||