| 000 | 00775cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2747-38 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u56461 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBurden of proving right to light | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v4 December 1991, 34 |
||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1991) EGCS 120 (2) |
||
| 520 | _a"Dance and another v Triplow" CA 7 November 1991. The decision of a county court that the defendant (T) should pay damages under the Prescription Act 1832 was overturned on appeal. | ||
| 650 | _aBURDEN OF PROOF | ||
| 650 | _aPRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHTS TO LIGHT | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34432 _d34432 |
||