000			01089cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS46106
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u56845
041			_aeng
245			_aRoper v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 09 EG 141-144(3)
520			_aQBD 19 June 1991. Roper, the plaintiff tenant, went to court to establish whose liability it was to replace electrical wiring in his rented farmhouse. Though he had covenanted to `maintain` and `repair` the fabric of the holding, R argued that as there was no fault to be assigned, there was no obligation to `replace` what had simply deteriorated with age. However, the court took the opposite view, noting numerous precedents in similar circumstances, and thus placed responsiblity with R.
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aLIABILITY
650			_aREPAIRING COVENANTS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34699 _d34699