000			01606cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS46109
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u56859
041			_aeng
245			_aVisionhire Ltd v Britel Fund Trustees Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1992 10 EG 95-102(5)
520			_aCourt of Session: Inner House 25 July 1991. Dispute over the meaning and effect of a rent review clause in a shop lease. Pursuers and respondents (V) held the term of the lease and defenders and reclaimers (B) held the reversion to the lease. Case concerned the provisions for initiating rent review including appointment of an arbiter or an expert valuer. The application for a nomination may be made not more than six months before or at any time after the relevant rent review dates. the lease provided that if by the first date for payment of rent for the relevant five-year period the lessors had not made an application for a nomination, the lessee may at any time thereafter state by notice the amount of such revised rent for the relevant period; unless the lessors made an application within three months after the date of such notice. The relevant rent review date was 1 August 1988. Parties had not agreed a revised rent. By a letter dated 29 July 1988, the lessors gave notice that rent
650			_aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aSCOTLAND
650			_aTIME LIMITS
650			_aTIME OF THE ESSENCE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34704 _d34704