000			01371cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS46111
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u56865
041			_aeng
245			_aCrago v Julian
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1992) 1 All ER, 744-749(6)
520			_aCA 21 November 1991. Upon divorce, the former husband of the defendant (J) undertook to transfer from his sole name, the tenancy of their matrimonial flat. Though in fact nothing was done to fulfil this obligation, J continued in occupation, paying the rent and spending considerable sums on the flat. Five years later, the managing agents were asked by J to change the name on her rent book, which they declined to do besides refusing to handle the rent. C, the plaintiff landlord, won the ensuing action for possession which was countered by J`s appeal under the Law of Property Act 1925 ss52-54. J`s case was that the Act did not preclude transfers of an orally created lease by means other than a deed. It was held that this was not a correct interpretation and the appeal was dismissed.
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aBOTTING V MARTIN
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 SS52-54
650			_aLEASES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34706 _d34706