| 000 | 01268cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46112 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u56866 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 09 EG 135-141(5) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 5 Dec 1991. The appellant (M) and his cohabitee, a Mrs Powell, parted company and the latter moved out of their flat which had been held on weekly tenancy from the local council. H, the respondent, made termination of the tenancy a condition of rehousing Mrs Powell. Accordingly, she gave a notice to quit without M`s knowledge, against whom proceedings to regain possession were brought. The CC decision that the notice was invalid was overturned by the CA, who granted an order of possession. M appealed, basing his argument on contractual principle, but his case was dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF TRUST | ||
| 650 | _aJOINT TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE TO QUIT | ||
| 650 | _aPERIODIC TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34707 _d34707 |
||