| 000 | 01256cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | W13171 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u56913 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aManifest disadvantage | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1996] EGCS 62(1) (13/04/96) |
||
| 520 | _a"Barclays bank plc v Sumner and another" ChD 29 March 1996. S each held half of the shares in a company of which they were sole directors. Approached B for assistance in expanding the activities of the company into property development. S`s house was sold and another home was purchased with a mortgage loan from B and an advance to purchase and develop a plot of land. B continued to finance further developments. In 1993 B made a formal demand on the company for £337,240.75. The bank`s security had been an unlimited guarantee signed by both defendants. Mrs S was given leave to defend guarantee claim. Judgment for the bank. | ||
| 650 | _aBANK LOAN | ||
| 650 | _aBARCLAYS BANK PLC V SUMNER AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aMANIFEST DISADVANTAGE | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGES | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34727 _d34727 |
||