| 000 | 01262cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46200 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u57138 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLinden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd and others; St Martins Property Corporation Ltd and St Martins Property Investments Ltd v Sir Robert McAlpine & Sons Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v(1992) CILL 731-736(6) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 13 February 1992. The court had to decide on the construction and effect of the prohibition on assignment. It was held that prohibition on assignment did prevent the benefit of the rights to call for the performance of the contracts from being assignable. However, assignment of benefits and claims for damages under the contracts were allowed, where the cause of action had accrued at the date of the assignment. | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aLINDEN GARDENS TRUST V LENESTA SLUDGE DISPOSALS | ||
| 650 | _aPROHIBITION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34817 _d34817 |
||