000			01114cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS46234
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u57268
041			_aeng
245			_aLewin and Rowley v SoS for the Environment and SoS for Transport
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 342-353(12)
520			_aQBD 17 July 1991. It was held that the SoSs had not erred in law by rejecting the contention that an alternative route for the link road could be proposed at the public inquiry into the side roads to the link road. It was held that the applicants, representatives of the Society for the Preservation of the Field of the Battle of Naseby, merely wished to re-open the dispute over the main route of the link road.
650	0		_aA1/M1 LINK
650			_aBATTLE OF NASEBY
650			_aBATTLEFIELD SITES
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
650			_aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980
650			_aHISTORIC SITES
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c34901 _d34901