| 000 | 01231cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46252 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u57378 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLayzell v Smith Morton & Long | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 13 EG 118-122(4) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 14 November 1991. The solicitors, having admitted negligence in failing to secure succession of a tenancy for their client contended that the client did not satisfy Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 s36(3) and that he was unsuitable to succeed. Both claims were dismissed and on assessing damages a figure was calculated based on the sale-and-leaseback of a similar farm. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986 S36(3) | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986 S39 | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aLOSS OF TENANCY | ||
| 650 | _aMEASURE OF DAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSALE AND LEASEBACK AGREEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSOLICITORS | ||
| 650 | _aSUCCESSION RIGHTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c34978 _d34978 |
||