| 000 | 00988cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46286 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u57578 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSalvatore Cumbo v SoS for the Environment and Dacorum BC | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 366-371(6) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 16 May 1991. Commentary on the case, which concerned an enforcement notice on a building used for agricultural and residential purposes in the green belt. At issue was whether there was sufficient justification for retention of the residential element for supervision of a viable farm enterprise. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL USE | ||
| 650 | _aANCILLARY USE | ||
| 650 | _aCHEESE-MAKING | ||
| 650 | _aDOE CIRCULAR 24/1973 PARA 6 | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aFARM BUILDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35126 _d35126 |
||