000			01351cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS46287
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u57585
041			_aeng
245			_aWorthing BC v SoS for the Environment and Breach; Van Dyke v SoS for the Environment and Southend on Sea BC; Doncaster BC v SoS for the Environment and Dunnill
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 353-361(9)
520			_aQBD 5 November 1992; QBD 2 October 1992; QBD 7 November 1992; Three cases where a single dwelling house has been converted into two separate dwellings. At issue is the application of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s172(4)(c), which provides immunity from an enforcement notice not issued within four years of the alterations. The first case is alone in finding the subsection applicable. This case and the last going to the CA.
650			_aCHANGE OF USE
650			_aCONVERSION
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
650			_aFOUR YEAR RULE
650			_aRETROSPECTIVE PLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aSINGLE DWELLING HOUSES
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S172(4)(C)
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S55(3)
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35131 _d35131