| 000 | 01042cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46313 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u57738 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aForestry Commission v Grace and another | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 15 EG 115-116(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCC 4 March 1992. The appellants, having been convicted of felling trees without a felling licence contrary to Forestry Act 1967 s17, claimed that the burden of proof fell on the defendants to demonstrate that a licence was required. The defendants contended that the appellants had to prove that the felling of trees came within the exception to the requirement for a licence under s9 of the Act. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aBURDEN OF PROOF | ||
| 650 | _aFELLING LICENCES | ||
| 650 | _aFORESTRY ACT 1967 S17 | ||
| 650 | _aFORESTRY ACT 1967 S9 | ||
| 650 | _aFORESTRY | ||
| 650 | _aTREE FELLING | ||
| 690 | _aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35239 _d35239 |
||