000			01206cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS46326
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u57817
041			_aeng
100			_aPowell-Smith, V.
245			_aAnother nail in the coffin of the Unfair Contract Terms Act
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aContract Journal _v363(5872) 7 May 1992, 10(1)
520			_aThe case "Barnard Pipelines Technology Ltd v Marston Construction Co Ltd" (1992 CILL 73) has shown again the difficulty of striking down a clause as unreasonable in a construction dispute. After defects had appeared in piping supplied by B, M withheld payment in part, counterclaiming £45,000 for damages in response to an action by P to secure its money. M`s assertion that the conditions of sale were onerous, and, therefore, both unacceptable and unaccepted, was dismissed by the court, the conditions being held to be reasonable.
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
650			_aCLAIMS
650			_aEXCLUSION CLAUSES
650			_aUNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35295 _d35295