| 000 | 01096cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46332 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u57849 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aSnakes and ladders for claims victor | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v257(7744) 8 May 1992, 28(1) |
||
| 520 | _aA subcontractor who was awarded £3m in court for the expense of a hugely inflated project, lost the award when the main contractor appealed (McAlpine Humberoak v McDermott International CA 5 March 1992). The appellant`s successful argument was that the value of the work, commenced a long time before the contract was sealed, should be judged as `variations`. As this was not the basis of the subcontractor`s claim, the payment based upon it was disallowed. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aOIL RIGS | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aVARIATIONS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35314 _d35314 |
||