000			01341cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS46353
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u57930
041			_aeng
100			_aPowell-Smith, V.
245		2	_aA sensible modern judgment concerning incompetent work
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aContract Journal _v363(5873) 14 May 1992, 13(1)
520			_aWelcomes the judgment in "Ohbayashi-Gumi Ltd v Industrial Fireproofing Ltd" where O, the contractor, unsuccessfully appealed against an arbitration decision which had granted compensation to the subcontractor (IFL) for the costs incurred in remedial work. This work had been executed after tests conducted by the employer, a procedure which IFL contended was unreasonable in detail. Disregarding the fact that the examination had been carried out by an unqualified trainee, the judge pronounced there was an implied term that subcontract work could not be rejected on the grounds of unreasonable testing, and such provision was both reasonable and necessary within the contractual matrix.
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
650			_aCLAIMS
650			_aREMEDIAL WORK
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
690			_aOVERSEAS-REST OF THE WORLD
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35361 _d35361