| 000 | 01147cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46354 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u57932 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aColbart Ltd v H Kumar | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v(1992) CILL 752-754(3) |
||
| 520 | _aOFC 31 January 1992. Dispute arose after the property owner (K)`s failure to pay the plaintiff (C) for refurbishment carried out and certified by the architect as complete. C issued a writ to recover his due. K`s defence was that the work was defective and that furniture had been culpably removed. Howover, this challenge had not been made within the stipulated 21 days after the final certificate and so the ruling fell in C`s favour. | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCERTIFICATE OF MAKING GOOD DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aCERTIFICATION | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aFINAL CERTIFICATE | ||
| 650 | _aPRACTICAL COMPLETION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35362 _d35362 |
||