000			01193cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS50817
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58002
041			_aeng
245			_aBurton and another v MBC Limited and another
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v(1994) CILL 921-922(2)
520			_aCA 25 January 1994. Held that a re-amendment of a claim against the builders of a bungalow which subsequently suffered from subsidence be allowed, as it did not prejudice the defendants. It is also a significant example of how long a straightforward building case can take, having been adjourned for two years. It will be due for hearing next year, seven years after proceedings were commenced.
650			_aAMENDMENT
650			_aANNS AND OTHERS V MERTON LBC
650			_aCLAIMS
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING ELEMENTS-COMPLETE BUILDING ELEMENTS-FOUNDATIONS
650			_aHOUSE BUILDERS
650			_aLOSS
650			_aMURPHY V BRENTWOOD DC
650			_aNHBC AGREEMENT
650			_aSUBSIDENCE
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35393 _d35393