| 000 | 01029cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46445 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58273 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aTaussik, J. | ||
| 245 | _aPre-application enquiries | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 414-419(6) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses attitudes of all parties to pre-application enquiries, the range of procedures for these negotiations within different authorities, the role of the development plan and the issue of charging for the service, which was recently scrutinised in a HL decision, "R v Richmond upon Thames LBC, ex parte McCarthy & Stone (Developments)", where it was held that planning authorities did not have the right to charge for pre-application enquiries. | ||
| 650 | _aFEES | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING AUTHORITIES | ||
| 650 | _aPRE-PLANNING APPLICATION INQUIRIES | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35559 _d35559 |
||