| 000 | 01247cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46448 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58290 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGillingham BC v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co Ltd and others | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 458-467(10) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 31 July 1991. The plaintiff council (G) commenced proceedings against M for public nuisance arising from increased night-time traffic generated by the conversion of Chatham docks to commercial use, despite its grant of planning permission in 1983 with foreknowledge of the likely disturbance. M contended that a public nuisance could not arise from a lawful act and the permission obtained legitimised this act. It was held that though the permission was not in itself an authorisation to commit a nuisance, it had created a changed economic environment in which the increased traffic was a reasonable consequence. | ||
| 650 | _aCHATHAM DOCKS | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 S222 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC NUISANCE | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35571 _d35571 |
||