000			01201cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS46449
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58298
041			_aeng
245			_aHertsmere BC v SoS Environment and Midas Developments Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 442-446(5)
520			_aQBD 16 May 1991. M`s plans to extend the accommodation at a listed building, rather than sell, were stalled by H`s refusal of planning permission as the building was sited in the Metropolitan Green Belt and thus subject to strict planning controls. An appeal against this decision was allowed by the inspector. This was challenged in turn at the high court under the terms of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288. At issue was whether the inspector had correctly tested the appropriateness of the development. The court found that he had and so upheld his decision.
650			_aGREEN BELT
650			_aLISTED BUILDINGS
650			_aOFFICE BUILDINGS
650			_aPEHRSSON CASE
650			_aPPG1
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35576 _d35576