000			01342cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS46450
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58304
041			_aeng
245			_aHigh Peak BC v SoS for the Environment & La Frontiere Stores Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1992) JPL 446-451(6)
520			_aQBD 11 July 1991. Whilst at the time of the original planning application for a housing scheme, the possibility of continued quarrying at the adjoining site neccessitated the refusal of permission, this threat was no longer current at appeal. Accordingly the applicant pursued its claim, citing the cases "Arlington Securities v SoS Environment and others" and "Wyre Forest DC v SoS Environment and another". QBD held, that the inspector, who had favoured the application, had neglected to take into account the possibility of an appeal in turn by the would-be quarry operator. As the threat of quarrying had not finally been settled, the planning application had again to be refused.
650			_aADJOINING SITE
650			_aHOUSING DEVELOPMENT
650			_aMATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS
650			_aPLANNING APPEALS
650			_aQUARRYING
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35580 _d35580