| 000 | 01155cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46486 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58512 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aFaulks v Faulks | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9215) 18 April 1992, 82(8) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 12 December 1991. Dispute over allocating a milk quota arose when valuing assets of an agricultural partnership which had ceased upon the death of one of two parties. The respondent`s assertion that the milk quota was an asset of the partnership was rejected by the arbitrator appointed under terms of the agreement. He appealed with a case based on the Arbitration Act 1979, but the ruling stood. | ||
| 650 | _aALLOCATION | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1979 | ||
| 650 | _aDAIRY PRODUCE QUOTAS (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aDAIRY PRODUCE QUOTAS REGULATIONS 1989 | ||
| 650 | _aMILK QUOTAS | ||
| 650 | _aPARTNERSHIP | ||
| 650 | _aQUOTA LEASING | ||
| 650 | _aWACHAUF V BUNDESAMT FUR ERNAHRUNG UND FORSTWIRTSCHAFT | ||
| 690 | _aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35739 _d35739 |
||