| 000 | 01035cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46508 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58600 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | _aRestistance doomed to failure | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v363(5877) 11 June 1992, 45(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case "Wates Construction London Ltd v Franthom Property Ltd" (Abs44353) which gives clear authority for the view that the employer is trustee of retention monies for the contractor as beneficiary. It was a breach of trust for the trustee to use the trust fund in its own business. Compares with two other retention cases "JF Finnegan Ltd v Ford Sellar Morris Developments Ltd (No 1)" (Abs44625) and "MacJordan Construction Ltd v Brookmount Erostin Ltd". | ||
| 650 | _aBANK ACCOUNTS | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aRETENTION MONIES | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35811 _d35811 |
||