| 000 | 01148cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3004-52 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58638 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aUse of agricultural buildings | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1994) EGCS 3(1) (22/1/94) |
||
| 520 | _a"Bromley LBC v SoS Environment and another" QBD 13 January 1994. An appeal against an inspector`s decision to allow continued non-agricultural use of farm buildings and adjacent land in green belt. Although reuse of redundant farm buildings was appropriate in green belt, it was held that the inspector was wrong in law to apply PPG 2 para 16 to land outside the redundant buildings. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL USE | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aFARM BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2 (GREEN BELTS) | ||
| 650 | _aREDUNDANT BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aREUSE | ||
| 650 | _aSCAFFOLDING | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35842 _d35842 |
||