| 000 | 00940cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3004-58 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58665 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aReductions available | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aCSW - The Property Week _v46(4) 27 January 1994, 72(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses briefly "Prodorite v Clark (VO)" where the ratepayers wanted a reduction in their assessment to take account of the depreciating effect of the CPO, which was soon to take effect. | ||
| 650 | _aCLEMENT (VO) V ADDIS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER | ||
| 650 |
_aCompulsory purchase _96228 |
||
| 650 | _aDAWKINS V ASH BROTHERS & HEATON | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT COPORATION | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1988 S121 | ||
| 650 | _aPEPPERCORN RENT | ||
| 650 | _aRATE REDUCTION | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35862 _d35862 |
||