| 000 | 01587cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46530 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58689 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSlater V CA Duquemin Limited | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1992 CILL 761-762(2) |
||
| 520 | _aORC 16 April 1992. In September 1986 S, the employer, entered into a Standard JCT Contract with Quantities (July 1977 revision) with C, the contractors, for the refurbishment and extension of a country house. The works overran the completition date. An emergency generator required by the contract was delivered in a damaged condition and had to be returned to the manufacturers. In January 1988 S barred C`s employees from site preventing them from doing any more work. S then employed further contractors at their own expense to complete the works. The generator was repaired but was rejected by L on the grounds that once damaged it might still be defective. The parties agreed that C were entitled to damages for disruption but other disputes were refered to arbitration. The arbitrator decided that S had repudiated the contract and that C were therefore entitled to an uncertificiated payment on the final account for the work which they carried out to the date of repudiation. He also held t | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aDELAYS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35882 _d35882 |
||