000			01541cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS46607
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58852
041			_aeng
245			_aWalker v Crocker and others
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 23 EG 123-124(2)
520			_aPlymouth County Court 4 April 1991. An arbitration had been conducted under Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 and Agriculture Act 1986 between the two respondents, concerned with the assessment of compensation of termination of a tenancy. The arbitrator had sought an opinion as to whether a letter between the solicitors in November 1987 was sufficient notice for the purposes of the Acts. Slightly different notices are needed under the two acts both require notice in writing, it was to be given before the expiry of two months from the termination of the lease and the landlord was to be notified of the tenants intention to make the claim. However the Agricultural Holdings Act also requires that the notice should specify the nature of the tenants claim. It was held that the letter was a notice for the purposes of both Acts as the nature of the claim under Agricultural Holdings Act was implied by the notice under the Agriculture Act.
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
650			_aAGRICULTURE ACT 1986
650			_aMILK QUOTAS
650			_aTERMINATION OF TENANCY
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35989 _d35989