000			01496cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS46608
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58854
041			_aeng
245			_aBrador Properties Ltd v British Telecommunications plc
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aScots Law Times _v1992 SLT 490-498(9)
520			_a2nd Division 5 September 1991. A lease clause for office premises provided for assignment with landlords consent and contravention or failure to implement any condition a tenant will forfeit the lease. Consent to sublet was refused. Instead the tenant entered into an agreement with a third party to provide `services and facilities` which included `the use of an office room`. The third party agreed not to impede the tenant in the exercise of his rights of possession and control of the office. The landlord purported to irritate the lease on the basis that the property had been sublet. The matter was referred to arbitration. The arbitor held that the property had been sublet. The tenant appealed on the grounds that the third party were business lodgers sharing accommodation. Held, the agreement was a sublease as it had only been drawn up in the terms mentioned to avoid needing landlords consent.
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aBUSINESS LODGERS
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aSUBLETTING
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c35991 _d35991