| 000 | 01723cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46609 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u58858 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHerbert Duncan Ltd V Cluttons | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 22 EG 110-116(4) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 20 December 1991. The plaintiff C was the leasehold owner of premises. By an underlease they demised the premises to the defendant H for a period of five years at a rent of £70,000pa. In 1988 H assigned the residue of the term of the lease to a third party. In July 1989 C served on the assignee a notice under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25 terminating the lease. H gave notice that they were not willling to give up the tenancy and applied to HC for a new tenancy under Part II of the Act. H however later discountinued this action and his occupation of the premises ended in February 1991. It was agreed on an interim rent of £200,000pa from 25 March 1990 for as long as the lease continued. The asssignee paid £60,794 towards this rent before going into receivership leaving a balance of £113,452. H claimed this sum from C as the tenant. The court therefore had to decide whether C as the original tenant is liable to pay the balance of the interim rent. It is held that C should pay thi | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT OF LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 |
_aInsolvency _96247 |
||
| 650 | _aINTERIM RENT | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S25 | ||
| 650 | _aTERMINATION OF LEASE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c35994 _d35994 |
||