000			01693cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS46641
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58974
041			_aeng
245			_aCambridge CC v SoS for the Environment and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 21 EG 108-118(6)
520			_aCA 5 February 1992. In 1989 a developer M was developing offices and purchased two houses with the intention of demolishing them and using the cleared site for car parking and landscaping. While the offices were being built M used the two houses as site offices with temporary planning permission. When that permission ended M intended demolishing the houses and telephoned the council to tell them the day before. It was pointed out that they had not given the required six weeks notice under Building Act 1984. M instructed their contractor to carry out a limited amount of work the next day to make the houses unattractive to squatters. In October 1989 enforcement notices were served on M and no further demolition work took place. The notices alleged a breach of planning control in the comencement of the demolition work and required M to return the houses to their original condition. M appealed to SoS on the grounds that the matters alleged as a breach of planning control do not constitut
650			_aBREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL
650			_aBUILDING ACT 1984
650			_aPLANNING AND COMPENSATION ACT 1991
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S88
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S173
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c36097 _d36097