000			01218cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS46642
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58980
041			_aeng
245			_aCity of Glasgow DC & another v Mackie
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 20 EG 114-118(3)
520			_aCS 25 July 1991. M, the respondent, had lost possession of a shop due to area redevelopment. Intended as a temporary measure, this became permanant through delays and M negotiated an end to his lease. The second appellant, Yoker, as agent of the first (G) completed the works, but became embroiled in a dispute with the LT over the level of disturbance payments. The jurisdiction of the LT to determine the amount was at issue. The appellants` case was rejected. Recourse to the courts was sought, whereat their appeal was allowed.
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCompulsory purchase _96228
650			_aDISTURBANCE PAYMENT
650			_aLAND COMPENSATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 1973 S34(4)
650			_aLTS DECISION
650			_aSCOTLAND
650			_aSHOPS
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c36101 _d36101