000			01586cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS46643
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u58984
041			_aeng
245			_aClarke v SoS for the Environment and Melton BC
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1992) 63 PCR 429-436(8)
520			_aQBD 5 July 1991. The appellant C built a barn which comprosed an agricultural unit for a flock of ewes. The barn was used to store equipment and as a repair workshop. The council served an enforcement notice requiring the removal of the barn as an unauthorised building. C appealed to the SoS who appointed an inspector to hold a public enquiry. C claimed he was entitled to build the barn because it was permitted development under Town and Country Planning (General Development Order) 1988 Sch 2 Class A. Issues arose as to whether the building was `reasonably necessary for the purposes of agriculture`. The inspector concluded that the barn was not necessary for the sheep unit and was not designed for agricultural purposes. C appealed. The appeal was allowed on the grounds that development permitted by the class is not confined to the particular agricultural activity being carried out at the time of the application and that it was designed for agricultural purposes.
650			_aAGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS
650			_aDESIGN
650			_aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988
650			_aSHEEP FARMING
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c36104 _d36104