| 000 | 00866cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2427-14 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u59093 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aDry rot claim succeeds | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v(1988) 97 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Ackerman and Another v Protim Services Ltd and Another CA 24 June 1988 the plaintiffs` claim against Protim for breach of guarantee was upheld on the grounds that an outbreak of dry rot was reactivated by a damp inner-wall face and as the wall was not as such defective, the infestation was not "as a result" of any failure by the plaintiffs to keep the property waterproof. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aDAMPNESS | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c36199 _d36199 |
||