| 000 | 00858cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2411-11 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u59254 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTree order compensation | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v11/3/88, p35 |
||
| 490 |
_aDaily Telegraph _v11/3/88, p4(2) |
||
| 520 | _aIn Bell v Canterbury City Council , CD 10 March 1988, it was held that a landowner who had been refused permission on the ground of amenity to fell trees on woodlands subject to a tree preservation order was entitled to be compensated for the diminution in the value of the land resulting from the refusal and not merely for the commercial value of the timber which he could not realise. (See WB2409-19) | ||
| 690 | _aCONSERVATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c36337 _d36337 |
||