000			01834cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS46770
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u59452
041			_aeng
245			_aPahl v Trevor
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1992 25 EG 130-135(5)
520			_aCA 26 November 1991. Appeal by (P) against the CC`s dismissal of a claim for possession of an agricultural holding on the grounds that the tenant (T) held a tenancy protected by the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. At issue is whether P is entitled to rely on the provisions for the granting of tenancies of agricultural holdings to which the security of tenure provisions of the Agricultural Holdings Act will not apply, first introduced by s3B of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948 (brought in by the Agricultural Holdings Act 1984) now contained in s5 of the 1986 Act. The farm in question was owned by Mr Malcolm Cockburn, father of P, who died in March 1984. He had farmed in partnership with T. In 1984 it was envisaged that P`s son then aged 16 would take over the farming interests after qualifying. Executors of Mr Cockburn`s will, P and her brother, applied to MAFF for consent to grant a five- year tenancy under s3B of the 1948 Act. In a letter dated 28 September 1984, the Minister appr
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1948 S3B
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1984
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aEXPRESSED DATE
650			_aFIXED TERM
650			_aMINISTERAL CONSENT
650			_aNOT MORE THAN TOW YEARS AND LESS THAN FIVE
650			_aPROTECTION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c36480 _d36480