000			01842cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS46771
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u59453
041			_aeng
245			_aBoots the Chemists Ltd v Pinkland Ltd ; Thorn EMI plc v same
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 28 EG 118-120(3)
520			_aCounty Court 13 April 1992. The defendants, P, owned the Elephant and Castle Shopping Centre and the plaintiff, B and T, occupied two units. T occupied unit 303 under a 21-year lease dated 3 April 1964. B occupied 2 units one under a ground lease granted in February 1965 for 21 years amended by a deed of variation. In August 1983 various questions needed to be resolved following applications for new tenancies under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The questions being for B re a positive trading covenant, whether the rent review was upwards/downwards or only upwards and the hypothetical term at rent reviews; for T the length of term and for both of them the management fees. Dispute arose as to whether T wished a three or ten year extension of the lease which changed T`s attitude towards T`s disputes. B sought to resist a positive trading covenant in their lease as only one of their previous leases contained one and now the two leases had been combined. It was held that this covenant shou
650			_aDOWNWARDS REVIEW CLAUSES
650			_aHYPOTHETICAL LEASES
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
650			_aLEASE TERMS
650			_aMANAGEMENT FEES
650			_aNEW TENANCIES
650			_aPOSITIVE TRADING COVENANT
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aSHOPPING CENTRES
650			_aUPWARD ONLY RENT REVIEWS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c36481 _d36481