000			01135cab a2200193 4500
001			Z4781
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u59503
041			_aeng
245			_aCIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt and another
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1993) 4 All ER 433-442(10)
520			_aHL 21 October 1993. A matrimonial home, valued at £270,000, had a mortgage against it of £16,700. The husband wished to borrow on the security of the house. He pursuaded his wife to sign for a loan of £150,000, which she did without advice or reading the documents. When the husband was unable to meet his mortgage payments C claimed possession. This the wife resisted on the grounds that she had been induced to sign under the undue influence of her husband and by misrepresentation. The judge agreed but as the husband was not the plaintiff`s agent the claim failed. P`s appeal was also dismissed and this decision upheld by the House of Lords.
650			_aMISREPRESENTATION
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c36513 _d36513