000			01487cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS46812
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u59551
041			_aeng
245			_aLambeth LBC v SOS for the Environment and the London Residuary Body
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1992 JPL 759-768(6)
520			_aCA 11 March 1992. The local authority (L) challenged the SoS decision allowing planning permission for redevelopment of County Hall. L argued that (1) the SoS had not paid sufficient regard to the policy set out in DoE Circular 8/87 "Historic buildings and conservation areas: policy and procedures (2) he had misdirected himself and had failed to have regard to public access to Jubilee Gardens and (3) failure to make arrangements for a contiguency fund to safeguard the building in the event of a developer not being able to complete the work. CA dismissed the appeal. It was impossible to prove that the SoS had failed to consider DoE Circular 8/87 and the contigency fund fell outside the ambit of planning control. Public access to Jubilee Gardens was to be secured under a S106 agreement with covenants.
650			_aCOUNTY HALL
650			_aHISTORIC BUILDINGS
650			_aJUBILEE GARDENS
650			_aLONDON
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aREDEVELOPMENT
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c36546 _d36546