| 000 | 01657cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46845 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u59700 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHood and another v National Farmers Union | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 25 EG 135-138(4) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 20 December 1991. The plaintiffs (H) are dairy farmers. In 1983 they sought to expand and bought a farm not used for dairy farming for ten years. The move, delayed whilst new buildings were constructed, took place on 4 April 1984. On 31 March 1984 the European Community introduced milk quotas. In April 1984 H received a provisional assessment of primary milk quota based on their milk production at their previous farm in 1983. This belonged to the farm, not H. They could not obtain a quota on the new farm as there had been no production there. H made an exceptional hardship claim on the basis of special treatment for those in the middle of an expansion programme. At Tribunal this was dismissed after a ten minute hearing which H felt to be inadequate. Shortly after, H joined the NFU and details of the case were passed to a representative. The NFU advised that there was no immediate action to be taken but that they were taking a number of cases to court to establish precedence. Howe | ||
| 650 | _aDAIRY PRODUCE QUOTAS REGULATIONS 1984 | ||
| 650 | _aEXCEPTIONAL HARDSHIP CLAIM | ||
| 650 | _aLEGAL ADVICE | ||
| 650 | _aMILK QUOTAS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 690 | _aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c36671 _d36671 |
||